%!$ Easy Diy Woodworking Bench Plans For You #!@

router-table-for-sale-near-me-latency Only 1 wifi 6 client i know of. Thanks again. This depends on things you have in between them. The WiFi in my house is constantly lagging - to the point where we have had two engineers come out in the last 6 months alone! It seems the Ner is the genie of routers. No article said anything about the failure of the routers to block these vulnerable devices.

For people on a budget a Cat 5e or 6 or good enough. For those who would like to future proof, I will recommend getting a Cat 6a or 7 if you are really rich. Not very expensive. Plus I have no complains about performance. Related: Need to Ship Something Overseas? The Powerline I purchased only has one ethernet port. To avoid spending much, I looked around and found a few options. The first thing that came to my mind is a splitter see picture below , which is very cheap but complicated to set up.

Additionally, it looks ugly and old-fashioned. Then I stumbled upon the Ethernet switch. Nope there is no switches. It is a box that allows you to have multiple Ethernet connection just like the back of your router. All you have to do is to connect the Powerline to the Ethernet switch and the rest of the steps is self-explanatory.

And Voila! My personal recommendation is to get the powerline and Ethernet switch from more reputable brands. Also, please do some cable management to avoid making your house look like a mess. Below is a good video on how to tidy up your cables. Like Us on Facebook! All Rights Reserved. By: Guidesify Stories Updated: July 1, Share on facebook. Share on whatsapp. Share on telegram. Share on reddit. Share on twitter. Table of Contents. Ethernet connection is a lot more stable.

Better Speed — Download speed does not change much but my upload speed increases from 20Mbs to 50Mbs. Their software has too many bugs and this case shows their refusal to fix some bugs.

Cisco addressed 67 high-severity bugs. That is far too many to have in software that is reasonably mature. Far too many. Again, just one week. Below is a summary of the CISA summary for assorted devices from networking companies. They may not all be routers and the severity of the bugs vary widely.

CVE Just CISA weely vulnerability summaries. D-Link VPN routers get patch for remote command injection bugs by Ionut Ilascu of Bleeping Computer December 8, No one makes money saying that newly discovered bugs are not that big a deal. So, this trio of D-Link bugs may or may not be a big deal, despite the fact that everyone says the sky is falling. To be clear, the most critical of the three bugs is indeed the worst possible type of flaw - anyone on the Internet can totally hack these routers.

What is not said, however, is whether the web interface to these routers is exposed to the Internet by default. If not, this is much less of an issue. I suspect the web interface is not available remotely because if it was, the company that found these bugs would say so. Either way, D-Link should say something about this in their response, but, they do not. They don't care about security. Further proof about how little D-Link cares about security is the timeline.

Three bugs were reported to them on August 11, Their first response was early December They fixed two of the bugs and consider the third not a real problem. At least on good routers they can.

I don't know if these routers support VLANs. December 8, Quoting: "The vulnerable component of these devices is accessible without authentication. Note that even after 4 months, the newly released firmware is considered Beta.

So far, nothing. Update Nov 13, It appears that one of these articles was wrong. The Netgear router was not hacked. Two bugs were found in the Netgear router. The bugs will be disclosed to the hardware manufacturers and hopefully fixes will be released.

What no one will say is whether the same bugs exist in other routers from these companies. One bug CVE was that the firmware update process accepted software with forget server certificates. This would have let spies and hackers install their own firmware on their router. An attacker would have to be adjacent network-wise to the router to perform this man in the middle attack, but it could result in a full compromise of the router.

There are two things here that are very important, much moreso than the bugs themselves. It is very likely they too are vulnerable, but it is none of our business. Then too, there is the way Asus handled this. For one thing they never issued a security advisory. And, as we see below in the Revision History, they could not be bothered to tell Rakhmanov when they fixed the bug. And, when he asked they were not sure if they fixed one or both bugs.

The research the story is based on is for a router that is End-of-Life no more bug fixes, it's too darn old to bother with. The bugs are in the web interface to the router, as they often are. Best practices for router security is always to limit LAN side access to the router's admin interface, and, of course, to disable remote administration. I found one bug quite noteworthy. It lets a bad guy bypass the router password by adding a couple parameters to the HTTP request to the router.

The same flaw was reported in and again in That tells you all you need to know about D-Link. July 23, This router is EoL. Vendor Disclosure was Feb. The number of critical bugs in Cisco software over the years has been far too high. I would not use their products. Cisco just released fixes for 34 bugs, five of which are the most critical in that they allow bad guys to get total control of vulnerable devices. It has a default, static password that, if obtained by attackers, can lead to the full remote hijacking of a device.

This is a mistake that can not be forgiven and not the first time Cisco has had hard coded passwords. This is a very common flaw, improper validation of input. Translation: lazy programmers. Cisco Security Advisories from Cisco. Lots of bugs documented in the middle of July. Tenda AC15 AC Vulnerabilities Discovered and Exploited by Sanjana Sarda of Independent Security Evaluators July 10, Their research uncovered five bugs including two methods attackers can use to gain persistent unauthenticated root access to the router.

They also found 7 open LAN side ports. Much of this article is focused on the specifics on the bugs and it leaves out the implications. Does a user have to be logged in to exploit the bug or not? Despite this, the article is very useful at the end. ISE first contacted Tenda in January Here, six months later, no response from Tenda at all. And, as always with router bugs, it is likely that similar flaws exist in other firmware versions and other Tenda routers.

The article adds some context to the story but does not clarify the nature of the bugs. The vulnerability, which allows for remote code execution, has been present in the R since it was released in But that is only the beginning. Adam was able to identify 79 different Netgear devices and Netgear firmware images that included the buggy code.

The oldest buggy firmware dated back to The vulnerability was reported to Netgear on May 7, and they seemed to have ignored it. Using assorted scripts, Adam created an exploit for each of the buggy firmware images. Then, he tested his exploit on 28 of the vulnerable devices to ensure that it worked as expected. Discusses two defenses, the obvious one being turning off remote administration. Netgear just released hotfixes for two of the routers. The article has the full list of 79 vulnerable models.

June 18, 79 Netgear router models risk full takeover due to unpatched bug by Lawrence Abrams of Bleeping Computer June 18, The proof of concept exploit at Github. It is a Python script that starts the telnet daemon as root listening on TCP port and not requiring a password to login. June 15, Looks to be a similar bug to the above. Maybe the same? Can't tell as this has no technical details. The interesting thing here, to me, is how Netgear ignored the bug report for six months.

Living on a prayer? Netgear not quite halfway there with patches for 28 out of 79 vulnerable router models The Register June 30, However, on the website for European countries, the status is "End of Sale" which means that it can no longer be purchased but it is still supported by the vendor. Now, over three months later, D-Link released beta firmware that fixes three of the six flaws.

Two bigger issues: 1 What about other models? Unit 42 warned that newer routers may be vulnerable to the same flaws because they share a common code base. A good router vendor will check for the same flaw in all their products. A bad router vendor will not. The response from D-Link said nothing about any other models. Why is Unit 42 even looking at ancient consumer devices? No date. Multiple Vulnerabilities in Wavlink Router leads to Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution by James Clee April 18, Clee started a new hobby - buying cheap Chinese technology to see what he could find out about security.

He found back doors and miserable password verifications. Quoting: " This is not a company you want to deal with. They were just as bad as the router.

He found that lots of web pages are externally accessible without authentication and they contain sensitive data. He could get the username and password without authenticating to the devices. Once again, Wavlink did not respond to any of his attempts at communication. Sophos learned about the problem on April 22nd when a customer reported something strange. They published an emergency security update on April 25th. The firewalls can self-update, though I doubt every user has that enabled.

No surprise to learn that vulnerable firewalls had either their administration or User Portal control panel exposed to the Internet. The bug let bad guys steal files from the XG firewall, and those files could include usernames and hashed passwords for the firewall administrator, for the firewall portal admins and for user accounts used for remote access to the device. Bad guys could also learn the firewall's license and serial number, and see some user emails.

Sophos researchers named the malware Asnarok. From what I have seen, the Sophos response was great. You could not ask for more. Not only did they fix the bug quickly, they also documented the heck out of the issue. An extensive explanation of the problem. Asnarok Trojan targets firewalls from Sophos April 26, More detailed explanations.

In addition, the opkg unpacker is buggy; malformed data leads to a variety of memory violations. One of the bugs was introduced in February Fixes are available. Security Now! They first observed this in early December There are two different zero-day flaws in three DrayTek Vigor devices, the , and B.

The bugs could allow for arbitrary code execution on a vulnerable system. This could allow an attacker to eavesdrop on network traffic, operate SSH and Web based backdoors, and create system accounts. One flaw is in the login mechanism and it allows attackers to hide malicious code inside the router's username field. This malicious code can grant the hackers control over the router. Next, the attackers started recording traffic coming to port 21 FTP , 25 email , email and email. These are four very old protocols and they still use plain text.

It is assumed the attackers were looking for FTP and email passwords. The second flaw is in the "rtick" process and attackers used it to create backdoor accounts on the hacked routers. Qihoo says that around , vulnerable DrayTek devices are online. DrayTek issued updated firmware six days after they learned of the problem.

This is rare, vendors usually fix only the devices with the reported problem. April 3, The devices are seven modem-router gateways, odd routers including some Nighthawk and Orbi models and one range extender.

The worst of the flaws lets attackers remotely install malware on one router. A "pre-authentication command injection security vulnerability" on five routers could also lead to total network takeover. For a number of the flaws Netgear has not provided specific details. Does your Netgear router need an update?

Turns out, this is a hard question to answer. Netgear does a terrible job of communicating to its customers what each router's model number is. They hardly ever use the actual model number in their consumer marketing and packaging. To find the model number, turn the device over and look at the sticker on the bottom. The update procedure differs among the various routers. The article has a full list of the buggy router model numbers.

This has no information about the bug at all. This too has no information at all about the flaw. Adds some perspective: "Netgear has a long history of patching command injection flaws dating back to Good news: it is not easy to exploit the bug. Bad news: In the US, this will never be fixed. ISPs are virtual monopolies and thus have no reason to do a good job. Fixing this takes time, effort and money and few very customers will ever learn about it.

I tried to get a response from Spectrum, it was a waste of time. The company that found the flaw offered a tester script for Linux that seems useless. They also offered some JavaScript that can copied and pasted into a browser console to test if your Internet box is vulnerable. And, you may need to change the port number, which is why I suggest using nmap below. Netgear only offers free tech support for the first 90 days, so I can not ask them about this.

What to do? I suppose you could try and learn the firmware version that your modem or gateway is running and then try to find out if it has been patched for the Cable Haunt flaw. In the US, this is almost definitely a waste of time. First, see if your Internet box uses Broadcom. If not, you are safe. The Toms Guide article below has links to pages that show this for Arris and Netgear devices. For other companies see approvedmodems. If that fails, perhaps look for the technical specs of your modem or gateway.

Maybe try to contact the hardware manufacturer. If Broadcom If you have a router and a modem as stand-alone devices, run the same nmap against The buggy Spectrum Analyzer looks like this on a Netgear modem.

Found a Spectrum Analyzer? If so, nag either your ISP or the hardware vendor for fixed software. Lotsa luck probably won't happen. Better yet, block access to the buggy device. For more, see the Security Checklist page here, the section on Local Administration. If you have a router and a modem as separate devices, you need a nerd to configure a defense.

One option is something called a static route - some routers let you configure this, some do not. If your router supports firewall rules rare , see my blog below about creating an outbound firewall rule to block modem access. Cable Haunt vulnerability tests by Lyrebirds Jan. Broadcom released fixed software to their customers ISPs and hardware vendors in May When asked if the updated software was widely deployed, Broadcom had no comment.

The article has links to web pages that show where Internet boxes are using Broadcom or not. See Arris and Netgear. Using a router to block a modem by me in If your router provides outbound firewall rules, it can block LAN side access to a modem which offers perfect protection. Security researcher Gal Zror discovered 10 bugs in Ruckus devices. Three are biggies. They are in the web interface of the Unleashed line of APs. The flaws let a bad guy take complete control of a vulnerable router remotely and without needing a password.

As bad as bad gets. Patches have been issued but the routers do not self-update. Ruckus Cloud access points are not buggy. Neither are their SmartZone-enabled devices. This surprised me. For one, its the first mention of Ruckus in my list of bugs.

Second, Ruckus is a high end company. Then again, Cisco is also high end and their software has a terrible track record when it comes to bugs and flaws and vulnerabilities. Video of the presentation Dec 28, Decembe 24, Back in Oct. The bug could be exploited by anyone on the LAN to take full control of the router. Of course, many routers from the same company share the same firmware operating system so it was not a surprise when, in Nov.

Some of the buggy routers are too old and will not be updated. Some have already had fixes released. Still more, are slated to have fixes released soon.

In some cases, the router firmware must be updated twice. The vulnerability is in the code used to manage UPnP requests. Are other TP-Link routers safe? Don't know. No one said anything about other routers having been tested. The bug lets a bad guy take full admin control of the router. First, the bad guy has to trick the router as to the source of a login request.

This is not hard. Then, the bad guy simply has to provide a password that is the wrong length. If the password is too short, it locks out access to the router.

If the password is too long, it voids the current password letting the bad guy login without a password. TP-Link never fails to impress. Firmware updates are available. However, as the article below by Paul Wagenseil details, the firmware update process is miserable. Dec 17, The bug allows a bad guy, who does not know any passwords, to access the web configuration interface of the router. D-Link suggests disabling remote administration, resetting the affected routers and using a complicated router password.

That bug impacted 10 of the same routers. Spring puts this bug in perspective, noting a long history of bugs in D-Link routers. A September bug can leak passwords. A May bug allowed DNS hijacking. Also in , the L and AC had multiple vulnerabilities that could allow a hacker to gain remote access and control of device.

Note the plural use of the word hackers. The router was hacked by seven, yes, seven, different groups. It has been a few days and, so far, no response from D-Link on their security bulletin page. Will they acknowledge the flaw? Will they fix it? Time will tell. The bigger picture, however, involves other D-Link router.

It is likely that other similar routers share the same buggy software. The bugs are easily exploited and let attackers bypass the logon processes and execute malicious code. Three teams hacked the router on the first day. March A remote, unauthenticated attacker may be able to execute commands with root privileges on a buggy router.

This can happen as the result of viewing a specially-crafted web page. The bug was publicly disclosed by Fortinet's FortiGuard Labs, same as below. This appears to be the same bugs as below, just that is has been found in six more routers. Proof of Concept.

On a vulnerable router, this will disconnect the internet for a minute. They have critical bugs. An attacker halfway across the world could hijack these routers without needing a password. Everyone suggests throwing these routers away. I agree. End of Life is the techie term for the computing devices that are too old to bother with.

As Seinfeld might have said: No bug fixes for you! Manufacturers win twice with routers that are deemed EoL: they don't have spend money fixing bugs and they motivate customers to buy new routers. Usually EoL devices are no longer sold. Not so with D-Link. Three of them can still be bought new from third-party sellers on Amazon's U. Is the same bug in any other D-Link routers? None of our business. Fortinet, which found the bug, does not say which or how many routers they tested.

And, the D-Link response is limited to these four routers with no mention of any others. This is the original bug report.

The root cause is the lack of a sanity check for arbitrary commands executed by the native system command execution, which is a typical security pitfall suffered by many firmware manufacturers. SOHOpelessly Broken 2. This time the protocol is WSD a. Is there a printer in the house? WSD communication starts with requests to the IPv4 multicast address IPv6 uses FFC link-local scope. Being exposed to the WAN is only one bug, the other is that devices should only respond to requests to these two IP addresses.

WSD responses sometimes come from port , sometimes from random high numbered ports. No article said anything about the failure of the routers to block these vulnerable devices.

UPnP haunts us still. For good luck, also test TCP port from your home. Test UDP port from outside your home with: nmap -sU -p 1. They refer to these two networks as Host and Guest, most people refer to them as Private and Guest. Quoting: " We sent a draft of our findings to the manufacturers of the routers None of the other router vendors responded to our disclosure ". As I say elsewhere on this site, don't use a consumer router. The bugs are pretty obscure. For example, on some routers, a DHCP NAK from one network is erroneously sent to the other network which can be used to send a small amount of data to the other network.

This too can be used transfer data between the two networks. There were also some timing attacks. The biggest difference is that it connects to the Internet via 4G rather than an Ethernet cable. Pen Test Partners found multiple vulnerabilities in several well known vendors Mi-Fi devices, including pre- and post-auth command injection and code execution. The vendors involved were generally poor at responding to disclosure attempts.

ZTE was the worst, they responded that a device was end of life, so the bugs would not be fixed They also found bugs in Netgear and TP-Link devices. Good article. The bug lets a remote attacker get complete control over the device. The attacker does not need to login or authenticate to the device to exploit the bug. The problem is triggered with a malformed user agent field in HTTP headers. Patches have been issued but device owners have to manually download them and install them.

First, they have to insure the correct hardware version for the available firmware, then they have to get the firmware for their country. All processes on these devices run with root-level access which is just asking for trouble. They just released an updated version of their IOS XE operating system to patch a high severity bug - insufficient cross-site request forgery CSRF protections in the web-based user interface of the software.

The bug can be exploited by an unauthenticated, remote attacker who could persuade an already logged in user of the web interface to follow a malicious link. The link could then perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the victimized user. If the victim is an administrator, bad guys could modify the configuration, run commands and even reload a vulnerable device. The good news is that a victim has to be logged in to the system before they can be exploited. Also, exploitation requires the HTTP Server feature to be active and it is not always active by default this is version dependent.

Lots of Cisco issues over the last few years. Paraphrasing Red Balloon: There are two bugs that affect about different Cisco devices. This is due to multiple hardware design flaws in the TAm. The second is a remote command injection vulnerability against IOS XE version 16 that allows remote code execution as root.

The TAm is a proprietary Cisco hardware security module. It is the root of trust that underpins all other Cisco security mechanisms. Thrangrycat allows an attacker to make persistent modification to the TAm, thereby defeating the secure boot process and invalidating the chain of trust at its root.

While the flaws are based in hardware, they can be exploited remotely. Since the flaws involve the design of the hardware, it is unlikely that any software patch will fully resolve the fundamental issues. Cisco is working on patches for Thrangrycat, but notes that the patch will not be a straightforward update for most devices but instead will require "on-premise[s] reprogramming of a low-level hardware component. Thangrycat: a deadly Cisco vulnerability named after an emoji by Cory Doctorow May 22, Quoting: "Once this system is compromised, it can be forced to give false reports on the state of the system: for example, it might report that its OS has been successfully updated to patch a vulnerability when really the update has just been thrown away.

There are no workarounds available. Cisco says the bug is only vulnerable to local attackers. Interesting conflict with Red Balloon. A successful exploit could Here, the New York Times does what it does best, have unqualified people cover a tech story. They get an explanation of the problem, from Red Balloon targeted at 5 year old children.

Beats me why the newspaper can't hire actual techies. Quoting their virtual child: " This is structural. Thrangrycat is awful for two reasons. First, if a hacker exploits this weakness, they can do whatever they want to your routers. Second, the attack can happen remotely But the fix can only be applied In person Thrangrycat only works once you have administrative access to the device. Unfortunately, Attack 1 is a garden variety vulnerability. They created the patches, they just didn't publish them.

The bug lets a low-skilled attacker to get full remote access to a vulnerable router. The bug was first disclosed to TP-Link in October Shortly thereafter, they released a patch for the WRN router. But, the WRN was vulnerable to the same bug and no patch was released for it. TP-Link was warned about this in January , yet The bug. TP-Link kept thousands of vulnerable routers at risk of remote hijack, failed to alert customers by Vincy Davis of Packt May 23, Over 25, Linksys Smart Wi-Fi routers vulnerable to sensitive information disclosure flaw by Troy Mursch May 13, Thirty three Linksys routers are buggy and Linksys will not fix it.

They tried to fix it five years ago, but they screwed that up. Yet another confirmation of the opinion I offered on this site from the get-go back in - avoid consumer routers. The flaw affects Linksys Smart Wi-Fi routers. It allows unauthenticated remote access to sensitive information and its easily exploited by bad guys with little technical knowledge.

The routers leak information both about themselves and about every yes, every device that has ever connected to them. Sometimes it also leaks the device type, model number, and a description of the attached device.

Leaking the MAC address lets bad guys determine the physical location of the router. Data provided by BinaryEdge, shows that 25, Linksys Smart Wi-Fi routers are currently leaking sensitive information to the public.

The full list is here. This is yet another in a long line of HNAP bugs. The bug can also reveal if a router is using the default password thousands are without even trying to login. The worst part is that Linksys tried to fix this five years ago but clearly screwed that up. Then, when contacted about it recently, they had no interest in fixing it properly. Yes, if you disable remote web access you block the information leak. Best part of the article: "Ars emailed press representatives of Belkin, the company that acquired Linksys in , seeking comment earlier this week and never received a response.

Cisco warns over critical router flaw by Liam Tung of ZDNet April 18, Cisco has disclosed 29 new vulnerabilities, 5, 6 or 7 of which are doozies. Its too much for tech reporters to digest. The bug is as bad as bad gets, it can be exploited remotely by a bad guy without a password. There is a patch and a workaround. As with the first bug a remote bad guy without a password can obtain full control of vulnerable devices.

If the devices accept Telnet connections, a bad guy who sends malformed Telnet options while establishing a connection can execute arbitrary code. The Threatpost article below offers some context, noting that earlier this month, Cisco re-patched flaws for two high-severity bugs after their first attempt was botched.

And, they reported two new router bugs with no fixes or workarounds. Just what you want in a router vendor. No other models were tested, so it is likely that others in the same family are vulnerable too.

These models are old they are Mbps Wi-Fi N and have been discontinued. The bug allows bad guys to take control of the device from a remote location. Sounds worse than it is. You have to already be logged on to the web interface to exploit the flaw. And, the flaw is in the web interface, so if Remote Administration is disabled, as it often is, then it can not be exploited from overseas.

TP-Link issued patches. Why are so many of these reports about ancient routers? A Command Injection flaw can only be exploited by a user already logged on to the device. Because HTTPS is not enforced in the web interface, an attacker on the LAN side can intercept login Router Tables For Sale Near Me Qq requests using a packet sniffer and then replay the requests to get admin access to the web interface of the router. Packet sniffing a login request also provides a salted password hash SHA An unauthenticated attacker can retrieve the password salt simply by visiting a URL in a web browser.

Thus, an attacker could perform an offline dictionary attack to recover the original password. Of course, the focus on passwords is because insecure firmware, like this, always uses the same userid.

If you have a G you should verify this. The real lesson here is not use hardware from an ISP. See the Disclosure Timeline in the first article below and judge the Verizon repsonse for yourself. Shows how to check the firmware release on the buggy gateway device. TP-Link ignored the problem. To me, this is the more important issue, much more interesting than the bug itself.

Garret wrote: "I reported this to TP-Link in December via their security disclosure form, a process that was made difficult by the "Detailed description" field being limited to characters. The page informed me that I'd hear back within three business days - a couple of weeks later, with no response, I tweeted at them asking for a contact and heard nothing back.

Ignoring security problems is one of three mistakes TP-Link made. They also ship devices with debug daemons, software intended for testing, that does not belong in a released product. This bug allows allows arbitrary command execution, as root, without authentication, from devices on the LAN. To better control access to the router from LAN-side devices see the Local Administration section of my security checklist. Excellent article. Worth reading even if you do not own TP-Link devices.

The BSI assigned a severity rating of "high". The bugs allow attackers to bypass the logon processes and execute malicious code. The bugs are easily exploited.

My guess time will tell is that these bugs will not be fixed. They are looking into it. Check their website for updates. Where on the website? They don't say. Which website? But Cisco makes routers and the bigger issue, to me, is just how trustworthy Cisco is.

They appear on this bug list often. Would you buy a router from them? Quoting: "ISE is distributed by Cisco as a virtual appliance. We have analysed version 2.

By putting them all together, we can achieve remote code execution as root, provided we can trap an administrator into visiting the page vulnerable to the stored cross site scripting. They are still shipping and recommending a product version vulnerable to unauthenticated remote code execution, with a fully working public exploit and no way to track fixes or fixed versions for these vulnerabilities. First published January 9, Are the bugs fixed?

You have to be Cisco customer to find out. That is not what trustworthy companies do. Cisco released patches for the bugs on January 23, The next day , proof of concept software was released that exploited the bugs. The day after that, bad guys were scanning for vulnerable Cisco routers. The first two bugs expose information about the router to anyone who asks - no password is needed.

One of these bugs exposes the Admin password. With that, bad guys can abuse the third bug to run any Linux command on the box.

Information about attacks on these bugs is on the News page. This article explains how the encryption protecting the Admin user password was poor: " There is no patch, but there is a work-around. The most interesting question is whether this is a bug or a feature. The devices ship with an in-built privileged user account that is used for the initial login.

This account can not be removed. It is defined in a software-internal data structure and its not visible in either the running configuration or the startup configuration of an affected device. Bad guys can use this account to log in to a vulnerable device and execute commands with full admin privileges.

The work-around is creating a user account with access privilege level of 15 or higher? But, if that account gets deleted, the hidden one works again, without notifying system administrators. It sure feels like a back door that can be easily hidden in case the virtual cops are coming. Why else hide the existence of this in-built account? Also, there have been many other backdoors discovered in Cisco software over the last year or so.

It has been about 3 months and still no patch. Initially released Nov. Gibson felt that this is a feature, not a bug, saying "This sounds deliberate". He even objected to Cisco referring to this as a vulnerability. There is a fix for SRM 1. The fix was released Dec 26th in firmware version 1. Bug Synology-SA is in Netatalk versions prior to 3.

The bug allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code. This is also fixed in SRM 1. The bug: "An authenticated user can visit the page atbox. No excuse for this at all. An unauthenticated user can visit the page 'spaces. A remote unauthenticated user can access the file 'dirary0. The bug descriptions all say both that the attacker has to be authenticated and that the attacker does not have to be authenticated.

It is not clear if these bugs can be exploited remotely or not. D-Link was notified of the bugs in June and never created a patch. The pattern is clear. This programming bug is so bad, really so amateurish, that avoiding D-Link devices altogether seems the smart thing to do.

Huawei for creating the vulnerability and the companies running Huawei routers for using default credentials. All they need do is examine the HTML for the logon page. The problem was reported to Huawei in Sept. The vulnerable routers are high end devices used by ISPs and the patch has not yet been installed everywhere.

Which specific routers are vulnerable was not disclosed. It is a bug, we fixed it, but the fix is not yet installed everywhere. Two IP cameras were also buggy.

For all the flaws, it is not clear if they can be exploited remotely or not. One flaw requires the attacker to already be logged in to the router, but another one does not require any authentication. One flaw makes it possible to execute arbitrary commands on the router with root privileges.

The routers are old End of Life and will not be patched. A denial-of-service flaw and a file-leaking bug are both due to input sanitisation mistakes. The directory traversal bug lets anyone read any file on the system. Parsing bugs led to two remote code execution RCE flaws that can be exploited by a logged-in user.

However, the other two flaws can be exploited by anyone that can access the web interface. Definitely exploitable on the LAN side, and if remote administration is enabled, then exploitable on the WAN side too. The article said that fixes are available, but that does not seem to be true. On March 29, I found the newest firmware for the vulnerable hardware versions 2 and 3 to have been released in August and August , well before these bugs were found. D-Link issued a patch three months after the bug was first reported.

No one has said anything about whether similar models might also be affected. Seems like no one has bothered testing other models. The model in question was chosen at random, the researcher was looking into something unrelated and just happened to have this particular router available to him. So, it is quite possible that other D-Link routers are also vulnerable.

There will be a trial in January On a related note, I tried to view the tech support page for the DIRL router but it would not load in my browser. D-Link uses TLS 1. This is a very old and known buggy protocol and I had disabled its use in my browser. Describes the flaw in detail. Cisco removed its seventh backdoor account this year, and that's a good thing by Catalin Cimpanu for ZDNet November 7, For the seventh time this year, Cisco has removed a backdoor account from one of its products.

Five of the seven were discovered by Cisco's internal testers. The company has been reviewing the source code of all of its software since December In an attempt to make George Carlin proud, Cisco refers to backdoor accounts as "undocumented, static user credentials for the default administrative account" or "the affected software enables a privileged user account without notifying administrators of the system.

About their internal auditing. Two are command injection flaws, the third is reflected XSS. The command injection flaws allow an authenticated user to run arbitrary system commands with root privileges. The bugs were reported to Xiaomi in June. And, that's where it ends.

The article is, frankly, amateurish. It does not say if the XSS flaw can be exploited by an un-authenticated user. It does not say anything about fixes from Xiaomi. Yes, the bugs are in high end enterprise devices rather than consumer routers.

So, why is it included here? I felt like it. Millions of Wi-Fi access points sold by Cisco, Meraki, and Aruba a critical Bluetooth bug that could allow attackers to run install and run malware on the devices. The bug was found by Armis. The malware could get access to all subnets, that is, it would not be stopped by a VLAN.

The bug is in Bluetooth Low Energy BLE , in software from Texas Instruments and they were aware of the issue, but they were not aware that it could be exploited in such a malicious manner. Fancy features. Retailers can use them to track customers inside stores by monitoring the Bluetooth beacons sent by smartphones.

Not me, Bluetooth is always disabled on my phone. Meraki and Aruba have issued patches. The real-world likelihood of this being exploited is debatable. Also, the bug requires a scanning feature to be enabled and it is disabled by default on all vulnerable devices. A second bug has to do with an over-the-air firmware update feature of Aruba APs.

The feature exists to ease firmware updates while developing products. It was never intended to be included in production devices. But, Aruba makes a password-protected version of the update feature available in their series APs.

Stanley Dresser Drawer Slides Pocket Hole Jig 50mm Led